Oxford Course Schedule
Main content start
| Week | Seminar Title | Major Theme | Research Tutorial | Project Milestone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collecting Empire | The “Universal” Museum | Session 1 | |
| 2 | Enlightenment and Display | The “Universal” Museum | Session 2 | Choice of comparative collection for dissertation |
| 3 | Provenance and Power | The “Universal” Museum | Session 3 | |
| 4 | Taxonomies of Difference | The “Universal” Museum | Session 4 | First 2,500 word essay due |
| 5 | The Universal Museum Debate | The “Universal” Museum | Session 5 | |
| 6 | The Museum as Site of Repair | REimagination and Repair | Session 6 | |
| 7 | Monuments, Memory, and the Afterlives of Empire | REimagination and Repair | Session 7 | Second 2,500 word essay due |
| 8 | Rhodes Must Fall: Activism as Public Curatorship | REimagination and Repair | Session 8 | |
| 9 | Co-Curation and Collaboration | REimagination and Repair | Session 9 | Final dissertation submission |
| 10 | Future Museums | REimagination and Repair | Session 10 | Mock Viva |
Assessment Framework
- For each major theme of the seminar programme: 1 x 2,500 word essay - 5,000 words total.
- For each research project: 1x6,000 word dissertation and an ungraded public presentation. The purpose of this public presentation is to generate output commensurate with early career research. In this Week 10 session, each student will deliver a 20-minute presentation of their research in a manner similar to that of an academic conference, and then participate in a round of questions posed by both their tutor as well as peers from the entire cohort, other students from the centre, and the wider network of postgraduates from CT and Oxford. The format offers students the opportunity both to gain experience in an academic conference setting, practice defending their own work, and to develop their skills in critical, constructive questioning. It is designed as a supportive, low-stakes environment that helps students gain confidence in articulating their ideas, responding to challenges and feedback, and engaging in scholarly dialogue.